|
Reading List: Invertebral Disc Degeneration by Professor Alexander Hadjipavlou
Introduction
The pathophysiology of intervertebral disc degeneration has been extensively studied but remains controversial. Several theories have been suggested.1 The more salient are the mechanical (heavy and abnormal loading, injury, vibration), hereditary, chemical, autoimmune, age-related, toxic (smoking) etc… Disc degeneration appears to be an prerequisite to disc prolapse, but there is no clear evidence defining whether aging in the presence of repetitive injury or repetitive injury in the absence of aging plays a greater role in the degenerative process that leads to annular tear. Furthermore, the evidence as to the origin of discogenic pain is even more confusing. It is reasonable to assume that all the proposed theories are acceptable. However, questions such as: How are the suggested pathophysiological factors linked together? What is the importance of these factors? Which factors initiate the events in the degenerative cascade? still remain unanswered.
Further, in reviewing the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British volume) for manuscripts published on this subject over the past years, I have selected ten articles supporting a variety of concepts as to the aetiology of disc degeneration.
Ranson et al2 described athletic injuries of the spine. Competitive athletes exert excessive and abnormal loads on the intervertebral lumbar disc resulting in disc degeneration. This is indirect evidence that mechanical factors can be implicated in the pathomechanism of disc degeneration. Lee, Ahn and Lee3 in a clinical setting studied whether facet tropism may influence disc degeneration by causing abnormal stress distribution. Similarly, Aihara et al4 in a clinical research supported by cadaver studies tried to explain the influence of abnormal loading on disc degeneration.
The adverse effect of abnormal mechanical factors to provoke disc degeneration, in the absence of any inherent discogenic factor, was supported in an elegant rabbit model experiment by Phillips, Reuben and Wttzel.5
The papers of Sugimori et al,6 and Burke et al7 suggest that inflammatory elements may play a dominant role in disc degeneration. Takahashi et al8 studied the importance of genetic predisposition as a major factor in the development of disc degeneration through degrading enzymatic processes. Furthermore, a genetic factor in the development of disc degeneration was also supported by Matsui et al.9
Finally, it goes without saying that blaming low back pain simply on intervertebral disc degeneration is also controversial. In a well designed study based on discographic findings and MRI scans of low back pain patients, Carragee et al10 concluded that imaging structural abnormalities had a weak prediction for disabling low back pain and a strong association with patients with phychosocial issues. However, good studies based on sound scientific principles exist indicating direct correlation between low back pain and disc degeneration. By what possible means does this occur? Some interesting answers attributing low back pain to some aspects of disc degeneration are offered by Peng et al,11 Toyone et al,12 Takebayashi et al13 and Burke et al.7
References:
1. Hadjipavlou AG, Simmons JW, Pope MH, Necessary JT, Goel VK. Pathomechanics and clinical relevance of disc degeneration and annular tear: a point-of-view review. Am J Orthop 1999;28:561-71.
Toyone T, Takahashi K, Kitahara H, et al. Vertebral Bone-Marrow changes in degenerative lumbar disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994;76-B:757-64. The authors studied the end plate and vertebral bone marrow changes associated with degenerative lumbar disc disease seen on MRI in 75 patients and compared these findings with the mobility of L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1 levels and the corresponding histological studies. The authors concluded that MRI cannot provide information on mechanical parameters of bone remodelling but can demonstrate a clear correlation between marrow changes on T1-weighted images and the incidence of low back pain and segmental hypermobility. References
1. Kirkadly-Willis WH, Farfan HF. Instability of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 1982;165:110-23.
Takahashi M, Haro H, Wakabayashi Y, et al. The association of degeneration of the intervertebral disc with 5a/6a polymorphism in the promoter of the human matrix metalloproteine-3gene. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:491-5.
Takahashi M et al reviewed the important biological role of the enzymatic degradation of intervertebral disc (IVD) matrix by metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3, stromelysin-1) in the production of IVD degeneration (Goupille et al1). They discussed reports from the literature indicating that MMP-3 expression is induced in response to local conditions such as inflammatory and mechanical factors. They highlighted the fact that a common polymorphism in the promoter region of the human MMP-3 gene has been identified as being involved in the regulation of MMP-3 gene expression with the 5A (5 adenosine) 6A (6 adenosines) alleles (Ye et al2).
The authors investigated the association between IVD degeneration in the elderly and polymorphism in the promoters region of MMP-3 gene.
They concluded that 5A allele is a possible risk factor for acceleration of degenerative changes of the lumbar intervertebral disc in the elderly. References
1. Goupille P, Jayson MI, Valat JP, Freemont AJ. Matrix metalloproteinases: the clue to intervertebral disc degeneration? Spine 1998;23:1612-26.
Burke JG, Watson RWG, McCormack D, et al. Intervertebral discs which cause low back pain secrete levels of proinflammatory mediators. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:196-201.
Following the findings that painful degenerative intervertebral discs contain more nociceptive nerve endings in the end plates of the disc and in the nucleus pulposous than does a degenerative disc which does not cause low back pain,1,2 Burke et al studied the production of inflammatory mediators in disc tissues in a similar group of patients. In a well designed clinical study, then compared the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in disc tissue from patients undergoing discectomy for sciatica (n=63) with those from patients undergoing fusion for discogenic low back pain (N=20) using an enzyme-liked immunoabsorbent assay. The statistical significance of the results of this study allowed the authors to conclude that the high levels of pro-inflammatory mediators found in disc tissue from patients with degenerative intervertebral disc associated with low back pain may be a major factor in the genesis of discogenic pain. Why certain intervertebral discs are associated with increased production of inflammatory mediators is currently unknown and needs to be investigated.
References
1. Coppes M, Marani E, Thomeer R, Groen RJ. Innervation of “painful” lumbar discs. Spine 1997;22:2342-9.
Philips FM, Reuben J, Wettzel FT. Intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to a lumbar fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:289-94.
Lumbar fusion induces alterations of stresses at adjacent, mobile, segments, predisposing them to accelerated degeneration and instability.1 Philips et al in an interesting rabbit model experiment (28 rabbits) investigated disc degeneration adjacent to lumbar fusion. The rabbits underwent bilateral posterolateral intertransverse arthrodesis at L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels using methylmethacrylate and wire, in order to obtain immediate rigid stability and avoid the possibility of pseudarthrosis when using bone graft. Loss of the normal parallel arrangement of collagen bundles within the annular lamellae was observed in intervertebral discs adjacent to the fusion at three months. By six months, there was further disorganisation as well as loss of distinction between the lamellae themselves. By nine months, the structure of the disc had been replaced by disorganised fibrous tissue and annular tears were seen. Degeneration was accompanied by a decrease in the monomer size of prosteoglycans. An initial cellular proliferative response was followed by a loss of chondrocytes and osteochondral cells in the nucleous pulposus. Radiologically, narrowing of the disc space, endplate sclerosis and the formation of osteophytes at adjacent disc spaces were observed. References
1. Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 1988;13:375-7. Sugimori K, Kawaguchi Y, Morita M, Kitajima I, Kimura T. High-sensitivity analysis of C-reactive protein in young patients with lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:1151-4. In a clinical study of 101 patients (48 patients with lumbar disc herniation and 53 normal controls), Sugimori et al substantiated the findings of others that there is a positive correlation between high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and lumbar disc herniation. Furthermore, they demonstrated that patients with higher pre-operative levels of hsCRP may have a poorer outcome.
Based on published reports,1,2 the authors further advanced the concept that macrophages and other inflammatory cells in herniated disc tissue produce inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-1 (IL-1) interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-a, intercellular adhension molecule-1 (ICAM-1), lymphocyte function associated antigen (LFP-1) basic fibroplast growth factor (bFGF), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) leukotriene B4 (LTB4), thromboxane B2 (TxB2) phospholipase A2, nitric oxide (No) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMPS). These cytokines and particularly pro-inflammatory cytokine, such as IL-6 and Il-1, are largely responsible for increasing the cerum CRP. References
1. Saal JS, Franson C, Dobrow R, et al. High levels of inflammatory phospholipase A2 activity in lumbar disc herniations. Spine 1990;15:674-8. Matsui Y, Mizza SK, Wu J.-J., et al. The association of lumbar spondylolisthesis with collagen IX tryptophan alleles. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:1021-6.
Genetic predisposition to disc degeneration is gaining momentum. Most studies consider collagen defects particularly those of Type IX collagen. Type II collagen consists of three genetically distinct chains: a1(IX), a2(IX), a3(IX). Type IX collagen is important for the maintenance and normal development of hyaline cartilage, as a structural component of the matrix function and an interfacial protein in covalent cross-linkage to the surface of type II collagen fibril. Mutation in type IX collagen genes caused intervertebral disc degeneration in mice. References
1. Paassilta P, Lohiniva J, Goring HH, et al. Identification of a novel common genetic risk factor for lumbar disk disease. JAMA 2001;285:1843-9. Peng B, Wu W, Hou S, Li P, Zhang C, Yang Y. The pathogenesis of discogenic low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:62-7. Is degeneration of intervertebral disc (IVD) responsible for low back pain (LBP)? Is discogenic LBP a distinct clinical entity resulting from specific pathological changes in the IVD? If so, what are the specific histological disc changes that can be used as evidence to explain the pathogenesis of discogenic pain? It is difficult to answer these questions. References
1. Freemont AJ, Peacock TE, Goupille P, et al. Nerve ingrowth into diseased intervertebral disc in chronic back pain. Lancet 1997;19:350. Aihara T, Takahashi K, Ogasawara A, et al. Intervertebral disc degeneration associated with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: a clinical and anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:687-90.
Aihara et al performed clinical and cadaver studies to demonstrate the influence of vertebral hypermobility on the incidence and severity of intervertebral (IV) disc degeneration. References
1. Aihara T, Takahashi K, Ono Y, Moriya H. Does the morphology of the iliolumbar ligamnet affect lumbosacral disc degeneration? Spine 2002;27:1499-503. Ranson CA, Kerslake RW, Burnet AF, Batt ME, Abdi S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic professional fast bowlers in cricket. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:1111-16.
Fast bowling was reported to be associated with lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration, with a prevalence of 65% at a mean age of 17.9 years.1 In an injury surveillance study of professional fast bowlers in cricket, Ranson et al examined the MRI appearance of the lumbar spines of 36 asymptomatic professional fast bowlers and 17 active control subjects. They observed that fast bowlers had a relatively high prevalence of multi-level degeneration of the lumbar discs and a unique pattern of stress lesions of the pars interarticulares on the non-dominant side. References
1. Elliott BC, Davis JW, Khangure MS, Hardcastle P, Foster D. Disc degeneration and the young fast bowler in cricket. Clin Biomech 1993;8:227-34.
Lee DY, Ahn Y, Lee SH. The influence of facet tropism on herniation of the lumbar disc in adolescents and adults. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:520-3.
Farfan and Sullivan1 put forward the concept that asymmetry of the lumbar facet orientation may predispose to disc herniation. Subsequently, this theory was supported by some and challenged by others. Because of these conflicting reports, this Korean study studied this premise in 140 adolescents and 111 adults by measuring the facet tropism at L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels on CT scans. They found that there was no significant statistical difference in facet tropism between the herniated and the normal discs in both the adolescent and adult groups, except at the L4-L5 level in adults. They also concluded that facet tropism did not influence the development of herniation of the lumbar disc in either adolescents or adults. I am a bit sceptical about the last statement since it contradicts the finding reported by the authors that at L4-L5 levels there was statistical difference (p < 0.001-student’s t-test) between L4-L5 facet tropism and disc herniation. Unfortunately, this paper does not provide biomechanical data showing whether facet tropism is associated with abnormal or excessive loadings on the intervertebral disc. References
1. Farfan HF, Sullivan JD. The relation of facet orientation to intervertebral disc failure. Can J Surg 1967;10:179-85. Takebayashi T, Cavanaugh JM, Kallakuzzi S, Chen C, Yamashita Y. Sympathetic afferent units from lumbar intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006:88-B:554-7.
Takebayashi et al based on findings by others demonstrating that (a) in rats the sinuvertebral nerves proceed into the paravertebral sympathetic trunk though the rami communicates, (b) the innervation of the L5-L6 intervertebral discs and adjacent tissues is from L1 and L2 dorsal root ganglia through the paravertebral sympathetic trunk (c) and that patients suffering from lower lumbar back pain, experienced relief of pain when they underwent infiltration of the L2 nerve roots with lidocaine,1 decided to further investigate the pathomechanism of discogenic low back pain in the laboratory. Using neurophysiological monitoring in rats the authors studied the sympathetic afferent discharge originating from the L5-L6 disc via L2 root. Their experiment indicates that mechanical stimulation of the lumbar discs may not always produce pain, whereas inflammatory changes may cause the disc to become sensitive to mechanical stimuli resulting in nociceptive information being transmitted as discogenic low back pain to the spinal cord through the lumbar sympathetic trunk. They concluded that this animal experiment may partly explain the variation in human symptoms of degenerative discs. They commented that these findings corroborate well with Schaible et al2 who reported the mechanically insensitive afferent nerve units of the joint may become responsive in the presence of inflammation.
References
1. Nakamura S, Takahashi K, Takahashi Y, Yamagata Y, Moriya H. The afferent pathways of discogenic low-back pain: evaluation of L2 spinal nerve infiltration. J Bone and Joint Surgery [Br] 1996:78-B;606-12. Conclusion Professor Alexander Hadjipavlou |
|


